Big Halloween Day

I should break these topics into separate posts, but it’s representative of just how much information we news and current events consumers have to deal with on a daily basis. All of this happened on Halloween Day.

Civil War Controversy

The Twitter day began with controversial remarks by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly about the Civil War. Most of my Twitter feeds (ie. gaming and authors) are *extremely* sensitive to anyone trying to put the Civil War in historical context, so of course it exploded.

Just my two cents, but saying the Civil War was caused by a lack of compromise is about as uncontroversial as one could get, somewhat similar to a statement like, “Death is caused by a lack of breathing.” *Of course* the war was caused by a lack of compromise. All wars are caused by a lack of compromise. I mean, duh?

But in today’s society, if you don’t shout like a madman that the Civil War was nothing but a referendum on whether or not you like black people, you are somehow a “revisionist,” so Twitter outrage ensued.

Yes, obviously slavery played a very large role in the Civil War. Yes, obviously, the compromise would have involved slavery. But wars are very rarely ever about one thing and one thing only. Are we seriously supposed to believe that every person sighting down a rifle to shoot in the Civil War was thinking about slavery? It’s actually possible for many things to be true simultaneously.

I’m at the point now where I just sigh and rub my temples when people from New York and California and overseas start their lectures on the Civil War. Whatever, dudes. I live a stone’s throw from Cold Harbor and troops might have marched across my property, might have shot at each other, or stabbed each other, or more likely died of dysentery, right where I’m typing this sentence. You can’t live in Virginia without being a lifelong learner about the Civil War. People who recite things about the Civil War they read on Wikipedia somewhere tire me.

The only thing worse is when people start pontificating about how America was founded by people fleeing from religious prosecution, or that the Pilgrims founded America as a Christian nation. (Double-Zing!)

Okay, moving on.

Testimony by Facebook , Twitter, and Google

Next I discovered that Facebook, Twitter, and Google were testifying before Congress about how their services deal/dealt with Russian interference. I watched most of it on C-SPAN, but you can find the video from PBS on YouTube.

I came away from it very certain that social media is going to get the living bejebus regulated out of them. I can’t say I’m sad about that. Self-regulation isn’t working. The Big Three were not prepared at all. They spoke in Silicon Valley marketing-speak the entire time and couldn’t give a straight answer on anything. (I have a very low opinion of IT marketing types who speak in buzz words and lingo as if it really means anything. I work in this business and I know quite well they are often full of crap.) The Google rep literally said, “I’m not sure exactly how the money flow goes.” That is a direct quote. I wrote it down, I was so amazed. All three of them appeared to be evasive and defensive. I laughed out loud at Al Franken’s inability to get a straight answer out of them.

Following the testimony of Facebook, Twitter, and Google, two experts on how terrorists use social media came in and testified. (It starts about 2:30:00 in the above-linked video.) Those two guys wiped the floor with the social media reps. They were well-prepared, well-spoken, direct, and clear with their testimony. They were clear with their responses, and oozed an expert, knowledgeable demeanor on the subject matter. (As opposed to the social media reps, who oozed an expert demeanor in how to speak without saying anything.) Those two guys pretty much nailed social media to the wall.

I often get annoyed at how people who have good charisma and speak well get preferential respect in the world, but in this case I was glad.

Then Terrorists

Late in the afternoon (for me), about the same time as the testimony I described above, a terrorist attack occurred in New York City. (“You can just say New York.”) It was another one of those low-tech, vehicular manslaughter-style attacks. As far as I can recall, the first one of this kind in this country. At least the first notable one. The suspect (who was captured alive, amazingly enough), drove for 20 blocks down a bike path and killed 8 people.

I will be sad that people were hurt and died eventually. But right now I’m angry, so I want to take a slightly different tack in my response.

How much of a complete failure as a soldier in your holy war do you have to be to drive FOR TWENTY BLOCKS down a bike path in one of the most densely-populated cities in the world and ONLY kill 8 people? These so-called “terrorists” are (still) a complete joke. I am not even the slightest bit terrorized by these guys. “Oh no, it’s a terrorist! Oh wait it’s just an ISIS terrorist. It’s okay, I’ll just step slightly to one side.”

[UPDATE 11/1: I heard today that the guy planned this attack for weeks. And he STILL couldn’t kill more than 8 people in the middle of New York.]

These guys do not frighten me, they make me angry. How are people so colossally dumb being allowed to make so much of an impact on our lives? I’m starting to understand how people in the early 20th Century would cheerfully volunteer to fight in World War I and II. If there was some way for me to channel this anger into helping to fight ISIS, I think I would. All I can really do, though, at my advanced age and with my limited skill set, is write blog posts to mock and demean them.

Then The Politicization

There used to be a time when the politicization of terrorist attacks didn’t start until a day or two later, but we don’t bother with respectful distance anymore. It now begins immediately. The president certainly doesn’t wait, he started tweeting about travel bans or whatever right away.

But all sides are guilty of this.

After this attack, Left Twitter has been fairly quiet, beyond a few, “thoughts and prayers.” Right Twitter, of course, has exploded: See! See! See! Islamic terrorist!

After the Las Vegas attack, Right Twitter was fairly quiet. Back then it was Left Twitter’s turn to explode: See! See! See! White terrorist!

It’s all a game to these Twitter activists.

Final thoughts on this terrorist attack: I am completely confident that the people of New York will bounce back, and will not be cowed by fear, and I respect them for it. We should all strive to be like them.

Most of all, we should all keep our eyes open when we’re out and about in the world.

UPDATE

Oh, I forgot to mention the other reason people went berserk over Kelly’s remarks about the Civil War. He said something about respecting General Lee as a commander, which is JUST. NOT. DONE. in today’s society. I mean, to kids today, you might as well paint a swastika on your front porch, shave your head, and start in with the Nazi salute. (No, the Civil War and World War II have nothing to do with each other, but you know kids today. It’s all the same to them.)

I’m not qualified to judge any military generals, but it seems to me that Lee won some and he lost some. He is highly praised by experts for his audacity in some battles. He is criticized for overextending himself in others. I personally think whatever brilliance he had as a general may have been over-accentuated because of the complete and utter incompetence of the Union army for the vast majority of the war. Some battles were handed to Lee on a silver platter because General Meade basically just sat around twiddling his thumbs and throwing his soldiers’ lives away.

The point is, again: Many things can be true at the same time. Lee can be a great general. Lee can make terrible mistakes. Lee can be a great person. Lee can be a horrible monster. All can be true.

Summer of Weinstein

I never mentioned the Harvey Weinstein story here, mainly because I generally try to avoid the minefield known as gender topics. But I wasn’t surprised. It’s Hollywood. Stories about sleazy executives go way back, plus we all know that most people are monsters.

That’s not an excuse or a defense. It’s just, “Oh, of course Hollywood is like that. Everybody knows it.” It’s why sane people don’t exactly celebrate when their loved ones run off to Hollywood. I’m not blaming the victim, I’m just saying people who try to “make it” in Hollywood should go in with their eyes fully open, and be prepared. You *will* be entering a sleazy industry, and you *will* encounter sleazy situations and sleazy people. It’s a high risk, high reward kind of industry.

Still, I fully support Weinstein’s arrest, downfall, whatever.

#MeToo

I didn’t say anything about the #MeToo campaign either, when many, many women started using it on social media around me. I thought about it, but to be honest, as a dude, I’m not at all clear how to react in a way that won’t draw criticism.

“There’s a lot of #MeToo tweets.” How could you not know!?

“I’m sorry about all these #MeToo tweets.” We don’t need your pity!

“I’ve never seen anything.” Just because you haven’t seen it, doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen!

“As a husband/father/brother/son, I’m outraged.” It doesn’t matter whether or not you have a wife/daughter/sister/mother!

“I’m really angry about this!” Spare us your fake outrage! See also, “how could you not know!”

“I’ll just keep quiet.” Then you’re complicit and part of the problem!

I’ve seen all of the above responses either implied or spelled right out on Twitter. So as you can see, as a dude, I just have to pick my poison.

I am genuinely sorry that these things happen, and I would like to think I would intervene in a positive way if something like it ever happened around me.

But I’m aware that trying to write something like that on Twitter is likely to make people mad at me, even if I’m completely and utterly sincere. It’s why I generally try to avoid gender issues. But hey, this is a controversial blog, and nobody reads it anyway, so here goes!

Mark Halperin

Last week we heard an avalanche of sexual misconduct allegations toward NBC contributor Mark Halperin, which started from a CNN article. I watched Halperin a lot on Morning Joe, and I always thought he was a smart contributor to the show. It’s weird to think of him now as “that creepy guy from Morning Joe.”

Am I surprised? Yes and no. I haven’t read every single detail of the allegations but my first impression was that they didn’t quite cross the line from creepy to criminal. That line is extremely fuzzy. Is it a crime to be creepy? It shouldn’t be. But I fully support his removal from the show and NBC, because it sends the clear message that while it may not be a crime to be creepy, it certainly isn’t acceptable in polite society. Will criminal charges be filed? I don’t know enough about the law to answer that. My hunch is no unless it happened recently, and the allegations appear to go back some ten or more years.

I’ll be honest, my very first thought was: Oh, this is retribution for Morning Joe’s coverage of the president, and part of the White House’s passive war on journalists. That’s just a wild conspiracy theory with no basis in fact, but it wouldn’t surprise me one bit to learn someday that forces sympathetic to the White House had some hand in exposing Halperin’s misdeeds to the public.

Kevin Spacey

We learned from BuzzFeed that Kevin Spacey allegedly assaulted 14-year-old Anthony Rapp in 1986. (I link to BuzzFeed only for historical context. That is not a credible news source.) Again, it’s Hollywood, so not a huge surprise that potentially unpleasant things happen at Hollywood parties.

I’m aware that putting “allegedly” into that sentence up there somehow makes *me* the bad guy, but I don’t like to try people too much in the court of public opinion based on one BuzzFeed article. BuzzFeed, if I haven’t been clear, is a gossip rag, and nobody should read it.

I’ll be perfectly honest, I find it a bit suspicious. If Rapp wanted to file charges against Kevin Spacey for committing a crime, it’s one thing, but making an allegation like that to BuzzFeed? It doesn’t make much sense. Rapp clearly wants to destroy Spacey’s career without having to go through the bother of a trial. It seems highly unlikely that charges could even be brought for something that happened in 1986. It’s not at all clear that it would have been legally considered as sexual assault, pedophilia, or any variation thereof, and no doubt someone told Rapp that he didn’t have a case, so he went to BuzzFeed instead.

Far more disturbing to me than the alleged crime is the fact that Kevin Spacey’s career is probably over now based on one BuzzFeed article, and nobody is giving it a second thought. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not crying over Kevin Spacey, he’s going to be fine. He’s not going to jail, and if we never see or hear from him again, he’s going to have a far better retirement than I ever will. But what if it had been an actor who was just starting his career?

Exhibit A. Mr. @Pappiness is celebrating that *allegations* can destroy someone. Literally celebrating it, right there in black and white. He’s apparently quite happy that there is a way to circumvent the rule of law in this country, throw out “presumed innocent until proven guilty”–the basis of protecting the rights of citizens from tyrants for hundreds of years–and destroy anyone at will for any reason.

Forget nuclear war and guns, social media is the biggest danger to the world. Nobody has to pass a background check to get on Twitter or Facebook.

Virginia 2017 Election Ballot

Governor

Ralph Northam (D) https://ralphnortham.com

Ed Gillespie (R) https://edforvirginia.com

Cliff Hyra (L) http://cliffhyra.com

I don’t think I’ve seen any positive ads at all in this race. Perhaps one from Ralph Northam focusing on him being a doctor. That’s about it. I’m not sure I’ve seen Ed Gillespie speak a single time in an ad. Honestly I’ve been a bit surprised how little I hear about this race on television. Most of the focus seems to have been on the Attorney General.

Lt. Governor

Justin Fairfax (D) http://www.fairfaxforlg.com

Jill Vogel (R) https://www.vogelforvirginia.com

This race has been notable to me for the civil tone of their TV commercials. A refreshing breath of fresh air.

Attorney General

Mark Herring (D) https://herringforag.com

John Adams (R) http://www.johnadamsforva.com

There have been a whole lot of negative TV ads around this race. I will say, though, that I have not seen a single positive ad from Mark Herring, while I *have* seen a few positive ads from John Adams.

I’m sure that market research proves that negative ads work, but I try to highlight who has more positive ads (ie. who has even a shred of integrity as a human being, as opposed to being simply a puppet of their political consultants).

House of Delegates (74th)

Lamont Bagby (D) https://www.lamontbagby.org

Preston Brown (I) (none)

No ads seen, not surprisingly.

 

One other thing I will highlight is that I appreciate the candidates who secure their web sites with SSL certificates. Somebody in their campaign at least has some grasp on the world of modern information technology. (It bugs me every day that my own web site doesn’t have a certificate, but my web host doesn’t make it easy.)

 

ELECTION DAY UPDATE, 11/7/2017

The Lt. Governor’s race descended into the gutter toward the end, so no points awarded there after all.

Mueller Charges

People are pretty excited this weekend about Mueller filing charges.

I saw someone on Twitter who actually thought the president would be arrested on Monday.

Now I haven’t read the story so I don’t know what it’s all about, but I would be amazed to see anyone around Trump (today) get arrested. The only people to get arrested are going to low-level nobodys that we’ve never heard of.

But I want to go back to the dream that “the resistance” is going to see the president leaving the Oval Office in handcuffs.

Why exactly are we hoping for that? What exactly do we expect to happen *after* that?

I touched on this before the election, and it’s still a concern. We know there is a whole slew of people in this country (polls suggest 30%) who will explode if their candidate is removed, right? I thought it might be bad if their candidate didn’t win, but imagine if their candidate is arrested. From their point-of-view, it will be a coup against their government by a bunch of radical leftists and the media establishment. What do we think their reaction will be?

“Oh good show! Well played, sir! We’ll get you next time!”

No, probably not.

What will happen is angry mobs in the streets. Possibly in *your* town. Police will eventually have to start shooting and people will get killed. We think things are bad in this country now? It could get a lot worse if We The People keep acting dumb.

The smart course of action is to wait patiently and elect someone else in 2020.

UPDATE 10/30/2017

I was partially right. A low-level nobody + Paul Manafort. (The smart money has always been on Manafort so no surprise there.)

Here is the text of the indictment. It’s legit as far as I can tell. Trusted site, etc. (I did check multiple sources.)

UPDATE 10/31/2017

The biggest news on #MuellerMonday – it was revealed that a low-level nobody named George Popadapolous had already been arrested and pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents.

Skipping Wolfenstein II

The ad campaign for the game Wolfenstein II was brought to my attention in my gaming Twitter timeline.

I don’t follow that account and I sure won’t now.

Obviously games are marketed toward kids, and kids today think it’s the coolest, hippest thing on Earth to “punch Nazis,” thus an ad campaign for a game with cartoon Nazis is born.

Overall I like the Wolfenstein franchise and I’ve played many of those games, though I would describe them as mediocre. I don’t know a thing about this new game, but I’m absolutely, positively not buying it for any reason, even if it goes on sale for $5. I also will not be watching any streams of it, or any YouTube Let’s Play series about it, or retweeting any tweets about it. (That last part won’t be hard for me, since I never do any of that anyway.) I know it won’t make a bit of difference, but I have no desire to support this product in any way.

There are a couple of problems here. First there is the juvenile frivolity of trivializing a potentially serious situation with white supremacists by comparing them with cartoon Nazis. I’ve talked about the imbecilic use of the term “Nazi” a couple of times before though so I won’t rehash it here.

Second is the very hard push to make it seem like players are making a political statement in favor of “the resistance” by buying and playing this game. I will not under any circumstance participate in that. I respect the opinions of “the resistance” and I try to understand their point of view, but they are living in a different world than the one I’m living in. [UPDATE: I live in a centrist world.]

Third is that it’s just another shooter, probably no different from any other shooter. I already own many shooters. I don’t need to throw away money on yet another mediocre shooter.

If they wanted me to buy their game, why not, you know, make a good game that distinguishes itself from the rest? Why lean on cheap tricks and gimmicks that appeal to the lowest common denominator? The only conclusion I can draw is that their game is bad. Or perhaps worse: Mediocre.

P. S. I also didn’t buy that Donald Trump game that popped up on Steam in the wake of the election. (I’ve always wondered if they were sued.)

UPDATE

Oh look, here’s a quote from an MMORPG.com review which illustrates exactly why I’m passing on this game. I do follow this person on Twitter, but I completely disagree with this propagandist straw man rhetoric.

I’m frustrated as anyone with the rise of “White Power” in the US, and there’s no mistaking it, this game is in direct defiance of that bigoted ideal. If you find yourself on that side of the argument, you might not like this game. But if you’re not a total piece of shit, you’re going to love Wolfenstein II: The New Colossus.

Emphasis mine. If you don’t support the resistance and buy this game, “you’re a total piece of shit.” ‘Nuff said.

UPDATE 10/27

Spidey-senses tell me it’s a manufactured controversy to sell more games.

UPDATE 10/31/2017

Since there are hordes of people delighting in mocking those who aren’t buying or aren’t liking this game, I want to make it very, very clear that I do not care at all about a “liberal message” in the game’s story. (I don’t know if there is one or not, but one would assume this is the primary reason for most #GamerGate gamers to reject it.) I can consume stories with both hard left and hard right messages without any damage to my own sensibilities, because I’m an adult.

The issue I have is the very blatant advertising message that one must buy this game to affirm one’s credentials as a “right-thinking” person. (“Right” meaning “correct,” not ideologically right, obviously.)

UPDATE 11/29/2017

And one month later…

Free trial already, and not so much “punching Nazis” in that ad, is there?

Behind The Tweet: Libraries in the UK

I think public libraries are great, but I found this funny today. Funny in a “people are utterly incapable of putting basic statistics into context these days” kind of way.

There’s this guy in the UK who doesn’t like public libraries.

Then this happened:

People are retweeting his “surrender” and celebrating victory.

By my calculations, what on Twitter seems to be an overwhelming outpouring of support by 110,000 people for public libraries in the UK is: 0.2% of the adult population of the UK.

Zero point two percent.

I counted everyone over 24 as “an adult.” I figured people 24 and under might be in school or college and be more likely to *require* the services of a library. I probably should have *excluded* toddlers and such, but I didn’t.

That assumes all 110,000 of those Twitter people reside in the UK, too, which they undoubtedly don’t, so that percentage of library supporters can only be adjusted downward from vanishingly small to infinitesimally small.

By the way, I may have rounded some numbers up or down during my calculations, so it’s *possible* that figure isn’t precisely accurate. Don’t @ me bro. And yes, I know it’s not a scientific study and yada, yada, yada.

The point is, if Andre Walker “surrendering” is supposed to make me think that Twitter just proved adults overwhelming use and love public libraries, it didn’t. In fact it made me think more of the opposite. The guy who said “how ignorant and entitled can you be” should feel like a dope right now, because he inadvertently helped prove Andre Walker’s point.

Incidentally, I’m an adult and I haven’t been to a public library in probably 10 years. I could probably count the times I’ve been to one as an adult on my hands. I don’t have a library card and don’t even know how to get one or if I even need one anymore. I don’t even know where my local library is. And why should I have to *go* to a library anyway? Can’t I just use a web site?

But don’t be like me. It’s nice to know libraries are there, and I don’t want them to go away. I always thought it would be cool to work at a library, actually. I’d make them more accessible online. :)

Question of the Day: Immortality

I often get on a roll with posting to this site. A question occurred to me today after I saw a tweet related to the healthcare debate:

Is immortality a human right?

Some people on the left of the healthcare debate believe access to healthcare is a basic human right, the same as access to food and water. If we assume that the basic purpose of healthcare is to extend human life beyond its “natural” end point, and if healthcare is a human right, does that also mean immortality is a human right?

I don’t know the answer, but I thought it was an interesting question.

Behind The Tweet: Literal Meaning

Here’s a fun one:

That is correct. The meaning is straightforward and literal, and every time someone uses the word “Nazi” outside of a historical context, they disrespect the memory of everyone who died fighting *and defeating* Nazism in World War II. A “Nazi” literally belonged to the Nazi Party, which no longer exists. You can look that up. It’s a historical fact.

The correct terms to use today are “neo-Nazi” and “white supremacist,” or if you really want to be precise, the name of the actual radical organization which applies (they do have names, you know). I might even accept Nazist, because it at least acknowledges the issue. But I will not take anyone who believes the word “Nazi” applies in a modern political context seriously, because they are obviously ignorant of history. Or even worse, they are propagandists.

Fake News on Facebook

I think it’s great that people are looking into Russian hackers spreading fake news on Facebook.

But is anyone looking into Republican and Democratic activists spreading fake news on Facebook?

Probably not.

This is why the real solution to the fake news problem is to educate people on how to tell the difference between real news and fake news.

How To Save America

So we all know America is hurtling towards a violent break-up, right?

Just kidding. Kind of. Actually I’ve been reading a book about the breakup of the Soviet Union and there are some remarkable similarities. Michel Gorbachev was a radical reformist who basically turned the entire Soviet status quo upside-down over the span of six years. The result? Violent protests, internal power struggles, and eventually the end of the Soviet Union and the birth of something new.

Donald Trump is also a radical reformist, or at least he pretends to be. He’s also trying to turn the status quo in Washington upside-down, or at least he pretends to. Trump is even going the extra mile by driving a wedge between American cultures. What will the result be? We don’t know yet.

Anyway, I was thinking that Trump has been enabled because the radical left and right wings of the Democratic and Republican parties, respectively, are gaining more and more traction in this age of insular politics. I believe the majority of the country is still fairly moderate and centrist. So here’s what we should do:

All the Centrist Democrats and Moderate Republicans should leave their respective party and form a New Third Party. (Policy-wise, there isn’t much difference between those two groups anyway.) It would leave the Democrats and Republicans as the “radical” parties. Everyone who’s disgusted with politics would probably run to the new party in droves.

I have no idea what the logistics of this move would be, but I’m fairly confident that the “rules” are such that it would be impossible to pull off. America runs on the conflict between Democrats and Republicans, so any attempt to thwart the conflict would undoubtedly generate major pushback and armies of lawyers would strike it down.

UPDATE 10/13

I should amend this post to clarify that creating a massive centrist third party would put America back on the track of the status quo. I shouldn’t have said it would “save” America. One could certainly make an argument that the status quo of the past thirty or forty years is killing America, just as the status quo of the Brezhnev-era Communist Party was killing the Soviet Union.